Things2018-2024

my chess failure, analyzed with data

i started out strong in real-world tournaments. school champion, county champion, district, regional, kept climbing. earned my spot at state level.

then...nothing. the tournament never happened. bureaucratic nonsense. my entire over-the-board career ended not in defeat, but in administrative bullshit.

so i went online. if i can't play in person, i'll play thousands of games online and get really good that way.

here's my data from 2 years of online chess from main account

1,779
Games Played
419h
Time Played
51.8%
Win Rate
1906
Peak ELO

1,779 games. 419 hours. that's like 10 full work weeks just playing chess. and what do i have to show for it? a 51.8% win rate and a peak rating that's...decent. not great. decent.

how i actually play

Queen's Pawn
1150
King's Pawn
450
Giuoco Piano
440
England Gambit
330
Indian Game
225

I only focus on Queen's pawn opening

how my games actually end:

Games Won By

Resignation48%
Checkmate39%
Timeout12%
Abandonment1%

Games Lost By

Resignation41%
Timeout36%
Checkmate22%
Abandonment1%

36% of my losses are to timeout. not checkmate. not brilliant tactics. the clock.

i'm losing winning positions because i can't calculate fast enough under pressure. i understand the position, i know what to do, but i run out of time doing it.

why i failed

the goal was simple: get a FIDE title. candidate master, national master, something official. requires consistent tournament play, higher ratings.

i failed. completely. no title, no tournament success, just a bunch of online games that prove i can't manage time properly.

the competitive focus moved elsewhere. at least with coding, there's no clock ticking while i think... or is it?